One of the most basic lessons fiction writers learn is
how to handle point of view. We’re told that it’s a vital aspect of story – if not
the most vital – and that there are three basic types: First Person, Second
Person, and Third Person (divided into Omniscient or Limited). We’re told a few
more things. That First Person can be hard to control because your narrator
could tell the story in any order he or she wants or veer away from the
narrative entirely. That readers don’t like Second-Person stories and they don’t
sell (which is bullshit; I received an acceptance for a second-person story
today). That Third-Person Omniscient is even harder than First Person to
control, and that readers prefer Third-Person Limited the most, as long as it
doesn’t get too immersive.
I’m not here to dispute any of that. I am here,
however, to tell you that there are three other points of view -- or perhaps a better word would be perspectives -- which
writers may employ instinctively or learn to use as they gain experience, but
which they aren’t consciously aware of. There may be creative writing teachers
out there somewhere who are cognizant of these viewpoints and teach them, but I
don’t know of any. I’ve learned them by writing a lot, trying to understand how
I use them, and then trying to figure out how to clearly and succinctly explain
to others how to use them. And as a matter of fact, I just figured out that
last piece this morning – it was my Doc Brown Flux Capacitor moment – hence
this blog entry. I’ve named these points of view Observer,
Participant, and Experiencer, and they have more to do with how an author
imagines characters as they write than they do with narrative voice. They’re
about what happens in the writer’s head during composition that allows us to
create the illusion of character perspective. And unlike the traditional three
voices of First, Second, and Third Person, these other points of view can be
used separately or in combination, depending on the effect you want to create.
I’d even go so far as to say that these three points of view are perhaps more
important than the three traditional ones because they describe what writers
themselves imagine – or should imagine – as they write.
Allow me to elucidate . . .
Observer
Interviewers often ask me what’s the most important advice
I can give to new writers, and my answer is always the same. People grow up being
passive absorbers of media such as movies, TV shows, YouTube videos, etc., and
these media make no imaginative demands on their audience. We don’t have to do
anything but sit, watch, listen, and let information flow into us. Even people
who read a lot still consume thousands of hours more of undemanding visual media
throughout their lives. So when people decide to try their hand at writing
fiction, they instinctively write from the viewpoint of a detached, passive
observer, and their stories are dull and lifeless. “Writers need to write with
a more immersive point of view,” I tell interviewers. “Their words need to
stimulate reader’s imaginations.”
Observer point of view is different than just
consuming media, though. With Observer point of view, the writer imagines
themselves watching events play out before them, describing only what they see
and hear.
There are times when the Observer point of view works
well all by itself. Fairy tales, myths, and stories for preschool-age children
are often written like this, presented through the detached voice of an unnamed
narrator. One summer day, Busy Bunny was hopping along the main trail
through the Forest of Fun, happily singing a song to herself. Little did she
know that her pleasant day would soon become quite unpleasant, thanks to
the arrival of Grumpy Goose.
Observer point of view can also work well by itself in
experimental fiction, creating a distancing effect that keeps readers
off-balance, especially when combined with a Second-Person narrative. But Observer
point of view is best when it’s combined with Participant and Experiencer,
otherwise you’ll end up writing a summary of a story instead of an actual story.
Participant
Participant point of view is when a writer imagines a
character interacting with other elements in the story, such as the setting,
physical objects, other people, animals, etc. The difference here is that the
writer also imagines participating. Whenever an interaction takes place,
the writer describes it with somewhat vivid detail, detailing the character’s
physical response more than a mental one.
Bob gripped the shovel and chunked
its blade into the cold, hard earth.
An Observer would write something like Bob started
digging. The Participant point of view is more vivid, implying strength of
touch (gripped), strength of impact (chunked) and cold, hard
earth adds more detail to the sense of impact, and cold adds a sense
of temperature. The writer’s imagination is now participating in what the
character is doing, but only in a limited way. Participant point of view does
sometimes dip into a character’s thoughts, feelings, and reactions, but only to
a small degree, since the writer is primarily imagining themselves – via their
character – doing the physical action.
Experiencer
Experiencer point of view is when a writer imagines
themselves experiencing everything that occurs in a scene, especially what
takes place inside a character.
A single bead of sweat rolls down Jane’s spine,
causing her to shiver.
Not real, not real . . .
A high-pitched whine like buzzing mosquito
wings drills deep into her ears. She winces, eyes narrowed, jaw tight, and fights
against the pain.
Not real, not REAL!
“But it is.”
She doesn’t recognize the voice, but she
hears the mockery in its words, feels the dark delight underlying them, and she
knows she is lost.
This example is vivid, atmospheric, and impactful (even
if I don’t know exactly what’s going on in this mini scene), but it’s entirely
internal. Everything is what Jane is experiencing, and while this gives the
reader clues to what is happening (or might be happening) in the outer
world, the details occur solely in Jane’s psyche.
As effective as Experiencer point of view can be, the
danger is that it can go so far into a character’s head that it becomes nearly
unreadable stream of consciousness, the apex of which is a novel like James
Joyce’s Ulysses – widely considered one of the most challenging texts
ever created. (And certainly not a book most people would read for fun.)
Observer, Participant, and Experiencer combined
These writer-as-imaginer points of view can be used as
the only ones in a story, but a blend of them is most effective. Here’s an
example, broken down by type:
Observer PTV:
John sat on the kitchen floor, crossed his
legs, and rested his hands on his knees. He looked at Marcy leaning against the
sink, her arms crossed, a slight crease between her eyes.
Participant PTV:
“You’re angry.”
“No.”
“It’s obvious. You’re doing that little
frown you always do when you’re mad.”
“Little frown? Don’t
infantilize me, you arrogant fuck.”
Experiencer:
Her words hit him like a slap. He shouldn’t
have said it – said little – but it had slipped out. Maybe
he’d subconsciously wanted to provoke her, to goad her into losing that icy
self-control of hers. If so, he’d succeeded, but he’d never heard such loathing
in her voice before. Was this how she really felt about him? He feared
it was.
He tried to speak, but his throat was
tight and dry, and he couldn’t force out any words. Not that he had any idea
what to say. Maybe it would be better if he kept his damn mouth shut so he could
keep from making things worse than they already were.
Observer:
Marcy turned her back on him, gripped the
edge of the sink, and looked out the small window into their backyard. She said
nothing for several moments, then “Grass needs mowing.”
Encouraged by her neutral tone, John
stood.
Experiencer:
He wanted to go to her, gently put his
hands on her shoulders, lightly kiss the back of her neck in apology. But the
pain in his head was intensifying, the vision in his left eye already beginning
to blur.
Observer:
“Okay,” he said, and headed for the back
door.
And when we put the pieces together:
John sat on the kitchen floor, crossed his
legs, and rested his hands on his knees. He looked at Marcy leaning against the
sink, her arms crossed, a slight crease between her eyes.
“You’re angry.”
“No.”
“It’s obvious. You’re doing that little
frown you always do when you’re mad.”
“Little frown? Don’t
infantilize me, you arrogant fuck.”
Her words hit him like a slap. He shouldn’t
have said it – said little – but it had slipped out. Maybe
he’d subconsciously wanted to provoke her, to goad her into losing that icy
self-control of hers. If so, he’d succeeded, but he’d never heard such loathing
in her voice before. Was this how she really felt about him? He feared
it was.
He tried to speak, but his throat was
tight and dry, and he couldn’t force out any words. Not that he had any idea
what to say. Maybe it would be better if he kept his damn mouth shut so he could
keep from making things worse than they already were.
Marcy turned her back on him, gripped the
edge of the sink, and looked out the small window into their backyard. She said
nothing for several moments, then “Grass needs mowing.”
Encouraged by her neutral tone, John
stood.
He wanted to go to her, gently put his
hands on her shoulders, lightly kiss the back of her neck in apology. But the
pain in his head was intensifying, the vision in his left eye already beginning
to blur.
“Okay,” he said, and headed for the back
door.
This shifting between imaginative points of view is
what my mind does when I write fiction. I’ve been writing for forty years, and
I do this instinctively, without bothering to label the bits and pieces as I
go, but in the end, I weave a tapestry of different levels of immersion in a
story that hopefully brings my tales to life for the reader.
To learn how you use these points of view – Observer,
Participant, and Experiencer – take a selection of your fiction and highlight
each in a different color. The pattern you see will let you see how you interweave
the points of view throughout your work, and if you see too much or one or not
enough of another, you can try adjusting your proportion the next time you
write. You can also take a selection from a writer you admire, highlight their
Observer-Participant-Experiencer pattern, and see how they do it.
Yeah, First, Second, and Third Person are important
tools, but Observer, Participant, and Experiencer points of view will help you imagine
like a writer when you build a story, and that may well make them the most
vital fiction-writing tools of all.
DEPARTMENT OF SHAMELESS SELF-PROMOTION
Forthcoming Writers’ Workshop with Apex
Publications
On March 10 at 6 pm EST, I’ll be conducting a workshop
on Managing Pace and Tension in Fiction. It’ll be 90 minutes long and it’s
limited to 25 participants. You can register at the following link:
https://www.apexbookcompany.com/products/managing-pace-and-tension-in-fiction
My Next Horror Novel is Up for Preorder
My next novel for Flame Tree Press is A Hunter
Called Night. It’ll be out May 9, 2023, and it’s available to pre-order
now!
A sinister being called Night and her panther-like
Harriers stalk their quarry, a man known only as Arron. Arron seeks refuge
within an office building, a place Night cannot go, for it’s part of the
civilized world, and she’s a creature of the Wild. To flush Arron out, she creates
Blight, a reality-warping field that slowly transforms the building and its
occupants in horrible and deadly ways. But unknown to Night, while she waits
for the Blight to do its work, a group of survivors from a previous attempt to
capture Arron are coming for her. The hunter is now the hunted.
Order Links
Flame Tree: https://www.flametreepublishing.com/a-hunter-called-night-isbn-9781787586345.html
Amazon Paperback: https://www.amazon.com/Hunter-Called-Night-Tim-Waggoner/dp/1787586316/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1668832377&sr=1-1
Barnes and Noble Paperback: https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/a-hunter-called-night-tim-waggoner/1142487192?ean=9781787586314
NOOK: https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/a-hunter-called-night-tim-waggoner/1142487192?ean=9781787586352
Scheduled Appearances
Scarelastic Book Fair. Scarlet Lane Brewing.
McCordsville, Indiana: February 28.
Authorcon 2. Williamsburg, Virgina: March 31-April 2.
Stokercon. Pittsburgh: June 15-18.
Where to Find Me Online
Want to follow me on social media? Here’s where you
can find me:
Website: www.timwaggoner.com
Twitter: @timwaggoner
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/tim.waggoner.9
Instagram: tim.waggoner.scribe
Blog: http://writinginthedarktw.blogspot.com/
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZEz6_ALPrV3tdC0V3peKNw
This is perceptive and many readers may find it helpful. But I wish that creative writers would make use of the existing wide body of literature in literary theory, which is now about fifty years old.
ReplyDeleteTo begin with, from Gerard Genette, we've learned to jettison "pov" and the "persons," to talk about "focalization." This can explain how one chapter focalizes on one character and the next shifts to another.
Then we talk about "direct speech," "indirect speech" and "free indirect speech," which describes how deeply embedded a narrator is within the psyche of a character. You can see how this shifts from paragraph to paragraph.
David Bordwell in Classical Hollywood Cinema gives a great analysis of the the ways in which narration can be limited or "omniscient."